ABSTRACT
Objective: Severe disease onset of COVID-19 may result in alveolar injury and respiratory failure. Apoptosis and inflammation are the main causes of respiratory distress syndrome. Berberine is used in medicine as an analgesic, anti-asthmatic, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral. In the current investigation, the effect of berberine on COVID-19 outpatients was studied. Materials and Methods: The present clinical trial was performed on 40 outpatients who were randomly assigned to berberine (300 mg, TID, 2 weeks) (n=19) or placebo groups (n=21). Both groups received standard therapy and they were monitored on days 3, 7, and 14 after the beginning of the therapy for clinical symptoms' improvement, quantitative CRP, lymphopenia, CBC, and SpO2. The severity and frequency of these symptoms and the level of the parameters were statistically compared between the two groups. Results: On days 0, 3, 7, and 14, there was no significant difference between the berberine and placebo groups in the improvement of clinical symptoms (cough, shortness of breath, nausea, loss of smell and taste, diarrhea, dizziness, sore throat, stomachache, body aches, and body temperature), quantitative CRP, lymphopenia, WBC, neutrophils, platelets, or SpO2. Conclusion: Berberine (300 mg, TID, two weeks) is ineffective in treating COVID-19. More research with a larger sample size is needed to investigate different berberine dosages in other pharmaceutical formulations.
ABSTRACT
Background: Human cardiac pericytes (PC) were proposed as the main cellular target for SARS-CoV-2 in the heart due to high transcriptional levels of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. Emerging reports indicate CD147/Basigin (BSG), highly expressed in endothelial cells (EC), is an alternative SARS-CoV-2 receptor. To date, the mechanism by which the virus infects and disrupts the heart vascular cells was not identified yet. Moreover, cleaved Spike (S) protein molecules could be released into the bloodstream from the leaking pulmonary epithelial-endothelial barrier in patients with severe COVID-19, opening to the possibility of non-infective diseases in organs distant from the primary site of infection. Purposes: (1) to confirm that human primary cardiac PC express ACE2 and CD147;(2) to verify if PC are permissible to SARS-CoV-2 infection;(3) to investigate if the recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S protein alone, without the other viral elements, can trigger molecular signalling and induce functional alterations in PC;(4) to explore which viral receptor is responsible for the observed events. Methods and results: Cardiac PC express both the ACE2 and CD147 receptors at mRNA and protein level. Incubation of PC for up to 5 days with SARS-CoV-2 expressing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) did not show any evidence of cell infection or viral replication. Next, we exposed the PC to the recombinant S protein (5.8 nM) and confirmed that the protein engaged with cellular receptors (western blot analysis of S protein in treated and control PC). Incubation with the S protein increased PC migration (wound closure assay, P<0.01 vs ctrl) and reduced the formation of tubular structures between PC and EC in a Matrigel assay (P<0.01 vs ctrl). Moreover, the S protein promoted the production of pro-inflammatory factors typical of the cytokine storm in PC (ELISA measurement of MCP1, IL-6, IL-1β, TNFα, P<0.05 vs ctrl), and induced the secretion of proapoptotic factors responsible for EC death (Caspase 3/7 assay, P<0.05 vs ctrl). Signalling studies revealed that the S protein triggers the phosphorylation/ activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) through the CD147 receptor, but not ACE2, in cardiac PC. The neutralization of CD147, using a blocking antibody, prevented ERK1/2 activation in PC, and was reflected into a partial rescue of the cell functional behaviour (migration and pro-angiogenic capacity). In contrast, blockage of CD147 failed to prevent the pro-inflammatory response in PC. Conclusions: We propose the novel hypothesis that COVID-19 associated heart's microvascular dysfunction is prompted by circulating S protein molecules rather than by the direct coronavirus infection of PC. Besides, we propose CD147, and not ACE2, as the leading receptor mediating S protein signalling in cardiac PC.